For me it is a good proposal to reward the big believers of the project.
agree man, I think this is the best proposal for all contributors…
This is also my stance, I share the same sentiment. I believe those who stuck around should be rewarded. During the initial stages of ZetaChain only VIP Contributors were rewarded and regular contributors who did a lot of work did not get anything for their efforts as some were not eligible for the airdrop.
Despite this, they still believed in the project and stuck around to ensure that ZetaChain would reach the ears of many community members and the masses!
Agreed, the real contributors will stay motivated once they are awarded and we should be for our loyalty to the project! I think @DAOist_JC is an amazing individual with high intellect! You literally hit the nail on the head with your approach and feedback! @smokinturtle
Totally agree with you
A creative and very commendable idea for those who contribute early to the community
contributors roles able to get reward base on XP point as snapshot 1 are cool idea. I love team care about contributors roles. The reward with $ZETA token will be super good, may be have lock or cool down time are fine. No need to much about enough for paid for continues to do task on Season.2 for 6 months.
And about VIP 1.0 task, should be open idea for picture, MEME, post, VDO. Not only specific only VDO. And for reward “Choose 3 people every week to reward these lucky ones
and the rest of the top 100, let’s say, will receive 5000xp for participation every week.” Is fine.
SuperDan
If these XPs for VIP1 will go to the general pool and not a separate one, it makes no sense. My point of view is that there should be a separate pool for VIP1 with XP and rewards.
Agree with this idea, as a contributor I fully support devnet, testnet and mainnet. but rewards or appreciation from the team have not been allocated to contributors, I think they deserve that
I also support this approach. everyone who got a yellow role made an effort to get it. sorry, it could not be obtained. it is unfair to exclude them because of an incomplete form. and the XP level in the Hub shows support at the moment
In my opinion, the most reasonable and fair offer
This is my suggestion
• Based on XP from Crew3/Zealy, I also think it should be considered (Contributor only) because crew3 there is a quest to provide knowledge about zeta in the testnet phase
• Zetahub
200,000xp - low
300,000xp - average
400,000xp - the highest
A good approach would be to filter contributors who have previously filled out the form and provided proof of their contributions. These contributors should be recognized and rewarded, especially those who have worked hard to spread the word within their communities. A little appreciation for the often overlooked members of the ZetaChain family can go a long way. Some of us have been with ZetaChain for several years, and these experiences help create lasting bonds.
add criteria:
1.400.000+ xp in zetahub
2. role of zetanite
3. new form for confirming activity
I think it’s worth running another DeForm for contributors but after 6 October, that way we’ll get a sampling of real ZetaChain devotees. It’s only fair that a contributor who has passed the testnet, participated in the main network and stayed after the ‘seasons’ will be rewarded. This way we will close all questions regarding rewards and continue to develop omnichain community with real crypto-enthusiasts.
I am Yellow contributor and channel X has achieved millions of followers thanks to the contributions of all other contributors
I participated in all zeta campaigns and deserved a reward
Good idea, i agree
I had to continuously update the project and closely follow the project for more than 2 years, doing all the tasks of enthusiastically promoting the project, filling out the Contributor form to join Zeta’s campaign after mainnet.
Hello everyone, and thank you for considering the community’s feedback. Personally, I have been following the ZetaChain project from the very beginning and continue to use the blockchain daily. I was awarded the contributor role, but I wasn’t able to complete the form. Does this mean I am not eligible? Is it possible to reconsider this criterion, please? Best regards.
I agree with previous comments about the need to mark members who have the yellow “contributor” role. I suggest adding additional metrics from the HP program to the table created as of February 1. From my observations, I can say that people who are active in the mainnet usually have a significant amount of HP in the ZetaHub activity program. Therefore, I suggest using the state on September 1 with a minimum of 500 thousand HP as a multiplier.